ITAT Delhi held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as nature and source of credit duly explained by the assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that there is no justification of adopting lower Fair Market Value (FMV) merely on the basis of DVO report as DVO has failed to consider the specific features of the property commanding higher value.
ITAT Delhi rules on APCA Power Private Limited’s appeal regarding Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. Share premium received from non-resident examined.
ACIT Vs Ambika Enterprises (ITAT Delhi) In the legal case between ACIT (Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) and Ambika Enterprises, ITAT Delhi provided insights into capital contributions made by partners in a firm. The focus is on whether any addition under section 68 could be made in the hands of the firm for capital contributions […]
Analysis of ITO vs Balwan Singh (ITAT Delhi) ruling. The case focuses on the amendment effective from 01.04.2023 about source verification for unsecured loans.
Read the analysis of SPI Global US vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) case where sub-contracting charges taxability under India-USA DTAA was contested. Learn about the make available clause and the final decision.
Analysis of the ITAT Delhi order in Radial International vs DCIT case. ITAT directs AO to re-examine PF payment disallowance due to holiday on the due date.
ITAT Delhi held that once a matter has been considered and decided by the ld.CIT(A), the very same issue cannot be the subject matter of consideration at all by PCIT in the revision proceedings either on substantive basis or on protective basis. Accordingly, revision order quashed.
ITAT Delhi held that receipts from disaster recovery playout services and disaster recovery up-linking services are not in the nature of Fee for Technical Service (FTS) as envisaged under Article 12(4)(a) of India-Singapore DTAA.
ITAT Delhi held that addition alleging different rates quoted/ booked for the same area and same property unsustainable as buyers to whom the space have been sold have admitted to have purchased at the price shown and no other cogent or corroborative evidence brought on record.
