Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Ambika Enterprises (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 31/Del/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/07/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Ambika Enterprises (ITAT Delhi)

In the legal case between ACIT (Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) and Ambika Enterprises, ITAT Delhi provided insights into capital contributions made by partners in a firm. The focus is on whether any addition under section 68 could be made in the hands of the firm for capital contributions by the partners. A capital amount of Rs. 2,68,50,000/- was in question, with concerns around its sourcing and genuineness. The case verdict has implications for how capital contributions are evaluated within the context of taxation.

The case revolves around capital introduced by partners in their capital accounts. Observations were made by the AO (Assessing Officer) regarding capital introduced by Sh. Jitender Kharbanda and Sh. Mohan Lal Kharbanda. Questions arose regarding the routing of funds from M/s Seven Heaven Landcon Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Ambika Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. to M/s Ambika Enterprises.

The main contention was whether the appellant firm could prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the source of share capital as per provisions of section 68. The AO made an addition in the taxable income on account of the capital introduced, which was challenged.

Various legal precedents were cited by both parties. The decision of the Ld. CIT(A) emphasized that the appellant had discharged its initial onus and that the responsibility to explain the funds’ nature lies with the partners.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court [email protected], 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A Notes of account do form part of Balance Sheet: Supreme Court Bombay HC Quashes AY 2013-14 Notices Post 31-03-2021, Rules TOLA Not Applicable PCIT Central not competent authority u/s 12AB(1) to pass order on registration of Trust No Denial of Concessional Tax Rate Due to Technical Glitch on ITBA portal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031