Mool Chand Aggarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) cannot disbelieve cash book only on the ground that ‘generally individuals do not maintain cash book and it is not mandatory to maintain cash book for the individual’.
ITAT Delhi in Preeti Bhardwaj Vs ITO held that AO cannot treat cash deposits as unexplained when assessee has provided the source of cash deposits being cash withdrawals without bringing adverse material.
Sanjay Kumar Sharma Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi): ITAT’s ruling on interest under Land Acquisition Act as capital receipt and exempt under Section 10(37) analyzed.
Rugby Regency P. Ltd appeals against denial of depreciation on windmills and addition of income under Section 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act. Detailed analysis of the case from ITAT Delhi.
Reassessment proceedings on the ground that assessee was one of the beneficiary of Client Code Modification (CCM) by some broker was quashed as there was no material to infer that such client code modification had been done with the malafide purpose of shifting the profit or evasion of the tax.
In the Mihir Parikh Vs ACIT case, ITAT Delhi clarifies taxation on maturity proceeds of assigned insurance policies under Sec 10(10D) of Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that passing of an order in the name of an entity which has merged with another entity will make the order void ab initio. Accordingly, the impugned assessment order passed in the name of a non-existent entity is void ab initio and hence liable to be quashed.
The ITAT Delhi orders a review of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India’s income tax exemption claim, sending the matter back for verification by the AO.
Delhi ITAT ruled that to claim capital gains benefit under Sec 54, taxpayers must acquire a residential house within three years from the date of old house transfer. Analysis of Mohan Lal Jain case.
ITAT Delhi overturns CIT(E)’s rejection of Freepathshala’s 80G (5) registration application despite a 6-year delay, citing similar rulings.
