Delhi High Court held that in terms of section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when issues of determining taxability or valuation are involved, the appeal would lie to the Supreme Court. Accordingly, appeals are disposed of.
Delhi High Court held that under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, both the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and Faceless Assessing Officer possess concurrent jurisdiction to issue reassessment notices, reaffirming its earlier ruling in TKS Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Reiterating its view from K.S. Builders Pvt. Ltd., the Delhi HC held that both Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers have concurrent powers to issue reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court’s ruling in Neena Wadhwa v. PCIT upholds the concurrent power of both the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) and the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) to issue reassessment notices under Section 148, citing the binding precedent of T.K.S. Builders Pvt. Ltd..
Delhi High Court allows NALCO to file a delayed statutory appeal against a ₹32 lakh GST demand, citing inadvertent error and the ongoing Supreme Court challenge regarding Section 168A deadline extension notifications.
Delhi High Court rules that a Section 153C notice for AY 2010-11 was time-barred. Citing the RRJ Securities Ltd. precedent, the Court confirms the six-year block period for an “other person” must be calculated from the date documents are handed over to the AO, not the date of the original search.
The Delhi High Court quashed the retrospective GST cancellation of M/s Kansal Associates, whose sole proprietor died during the COVID-19 pandemic, ruling that the legal heir must be given a fresh opportunity to file a reply and receive a personal hearing on the Show Cause Notice.
Delhi HC rules FIRCs need not match exports transaction-wise for ITC claims. Total foreign remittance suffices; case remitted for fresh adjudication.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST refund appeal order after finding a system error generated a personal hearing notice post-decision, violating natural justice.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition challenging a Rs. 1.51 crore GST demand, ruling that the petitioner must utilize the statutory appeal process under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
