Court held that the order confirming fraudulent ITC and penalties is appealable under Section 107, granting petitioner time to file an appeal by December 2025.
Delhi High Court held that gains from legal transaction emanating from an illegal act would still be construed as “proceeds of crime” under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Thus, profits from artificially elevated share price qualifies as proceeds of crime and hence attachment justifiable.
The Delhi High Court held that notices sent to a GST registrant’s registered email constitute valid service, rejecting claims that personal hearing notices were not received. Proper email communication fulfills natural justice requirements.
Delhi High Court held that curbing right to appear in examination due to non-fulfilling mandatory physical attendance norms is contrary to spirit of NEP, 2020 and also UGC Regulations. Accordingly, Court directs to re-consider the same.
The Court ruled that blocking ITC beyond available credit under Rule 86A is invalid, directing authorities to remove negative blocking from the taxpayer’s Electronic Credit Ledger.
Delhi HC held that a show cause notice issued for excess ITC was within the statutory three-month period prior to the outer limit under Section 73. The SCN and order are not time-barred.
Delhi High Court directed payment of ₹ 36.85 lakh plus interest after Income-Tax Department delayed acting on ITAT order on indexation for inherited asset of AY 2016-17.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment under Section 153C cannot exceed the ten-year block calculated from the date of handover of seized materials, setting aside notices for AYs 2010–11 to 2015–16.
Delhi High Court set aside notice under Sections 148A(3) & 148 when petitioner’s objections and documents were not considered before reopening for AY 2019-20.
Delhi High Court held that a GST evasion informer has no legal right to claim a reward, noting such grants are discretionary and not enforceable through writs.
