HC held that notice is needed to be served to assessee under Rule 25 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (CGST Rules) before physical inspection is carried out.
HC directed the investigating officer to issue advance notice of 72 hours to the assessee to effect the arrest if necessary, after investigation in a case. Further directed the assessee to co-operate in the matter and produce the materials as sought.
Vodafone Mauritius Limited Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Ms Fereshte D. Sethna, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that the principal allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, which is a foreign company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius, had sold shares worth Rs.1295 crores, of an Indian company going by the […]
A perusal of the communication dated 21.11.2022 would show that the benefit of the concessional rate of customs duty available to the petitioner for importing equipment for the purpose of its solar power project, has been denied on account of a purported retrospective amendment to the Project Import Regulations, 1986
Delhi High Court held that order cancelling GST registration passed without application of mind by simply doing cut and paste job is liable to be set aside.
Man Mohan Patnaik Vs Cisco Systems Capital India Pvt.Ltd & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Upon a bare perusal of section 138 of the NI Act, it is evident that the genesis of an offence under that provision is the ‘return’ of a cheque by a bank ‘unpaid’, inter-alia for insufficiency of funds in the account […]
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court while relying on Hon’ble Supreme Court Judgments observed that has observed that the principles of audi alteram partem have to be followed by the Patent Office while rejecting a patent application.
Delhi High Court of the petitioner is that the impugned proceedings for reassessment have been triggered against an entity, which is no longer in existence.
A mere discrepancy in filing the Income Tax Return instead of the Income Certificate, despite the two documents evidencing the same parameters of income requirements, cannot lead to a situation where an eligible meritorious candidate is deprived of the scholarship.
CIT, International Taxation Vs Westin Hotel Management LLP (Delhi High Court) 1. Present Income Tax Appeals have been filed challenging the common order dated 29th April, 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 2013/Del./2019 for Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2015-16 and ITA No. 2012/Del./2019 for AY 2015-16. 2. Learned Counsel for […]
