Analysis of Delhi HC Ruling on order passed under Section 148A(d) passed by order Delhi High Court in the case of Divya Capital One Private Limited Vs. ACIT, alleging income of more than Rs one lakh crore having escaped assessment.
Extramarks Education India Private Limited Vs MES Central School (Delhi High Court) High Court held petitioner cannot be held to be deemed to have waived his right to invoke arbitration under the subject agreements by merely filing a written statement in the Suit which is not connected with the subject agreements and is in respect […]
Millennium School Vs Pawan Dawar (Delhi High Court) In V.E. Venkatachala Gounder v. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple And Anr.: (2003) 8 SCC 752, the Supreme Court held that an objection with regard to a certificate of Section 65-B of the Evidence Act is not available if it is not taken at the material time. […]
Geeta Singh Vs Pradeep Singh (Delhi High Court) If a company is a drawer of the cheque, it is a necessary party to proceedings initiated under Section 138 of the NI Act. The liability of a private person, in his capacity of a Director or any other authority to act on behalf of the Company, […]
Delhi High Court directs timely adjudication of objections on default tax assessment. Create an online portal, warns against delay. Read the judgment details.
Yashpal Singh Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) The Delhi High Court has directed the Centre that the process of appointment of Chairman and one Member for the Principal Bench at Delhi and appointment of Vice-Chairman and one Member for the Additional Bench at Mumbai be completed within six weeks. It further direct the […]
Laxmi & Anr Vs Shyam Pratap & Anr. (Delhi High Court) The petitioners have claimed maintenance under the Act 1956. Section 19 of the Act provides for maintenance to a widowed daughter-in-law. The daughter-in-law can claim maintenance from her father-in-law provided he has inherited some estate of her husband. The appellant has failed to disclose […]
Manish Aggarwal Vs RCI Industries And Technologies Ltd. (Delhi High Court) In the present case, quite clearly, the learned Sole Arbitrator has declined to grant the interlocutory order sought by the appellants in exercise of his discretionary power under section 17 of the A&C Act. Has this discretionary power been exercised in a manner that […]
Hari Shamsher Kaushik Vs Jasbir Singh, Managing Director, M/S Accura Care Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Petitioner submitted that the learned Trial Court dismissed the complaint observing that since the company had not been impleaded as an accused, the liability of the respondent as its Managing Director could not be attached under section 141 […]
Arbitral Tribunal had, on sufficient cause being shown, the power to recall the order passed by it under Section 25(a) of 1996 Act, terminating arbitral proceedings.
