Delhi High Court held that Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 provides suo moto power to the institute to initiate disciplinary proceedings against its member without any written complaint/ allegation.
Delhi High Court held that restrictions on utilization of input tax credit imposed under rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules cannot extend beyond the period of one year.
Delhi High Court directed 10% of the penalty amount imposed by the Competition Commission of India, the recovery of the remaining 90% of the penalty amount would remain stayed.
High Court Grants IGST refund with interest to petitioner in respect of various export invoices of FY 2019-20 for which details were incorrectly reported in GSTR-1.
Delhi High Court held that combine reading of provisions of reading of sections 67(2) second proviso, 67(3), 74(2), 74(10) clarifies that seized documents or book of things can be retained for a maximum period of four and half years.
Delhi High Court held that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Applicant is not guilty of the offence. Further, the Applicant is also not likely to commit any offence while on bail. Accordingly, bail granted.
Delhi High Court held that loss on account of the Forward Contracts cannot be considered as speculative loss and hence loss on Forward Contracts is allowable as a deduction from the income chargeable to tax even if the Forward Contracts have not closed.
CIT International Taxation Vs Bellsea Ltd. (Delhi High Court) HC held that duration of a permanent establishment would commence with the performance of business activities in connection with the building site or assembly project. A building site or an assembly project can only be construed at fixed place of business only when an enterprise commences its […]
Jurisdictional notice under Section 143(2) of the Act was issued against the dead person and the assessment order has also been passed against the dead person on his PAN without bringing on record all his legal representatives, therefore, the said assessment order and the subsequent notices are null and void and are liable to be set aside.
Delhi High Court held that the issue relating to passing on the liability or reimbursement thereof does not relate to the taxing power of the state or any action taken or an order made in exercise thereof. The contention that the dispute raised is non-arbitrable on the aforesaid ground is thus negative.
