Delhi High Court rules that proper officer must reach objective satisfaction before retrospectively cancelling GST registration. Key insights explained.
Delhi High Court remits matter in EMCO Cables (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India case, citing opportunity denied by GST officer. Full text judgment analysis provided.
Delhi High Court quashes CGST Act order for not considering petitioner’s detailed reply, directs re-adjudication by Proper Officer.
Bijender Thakur vs Commissioner of GST & Ors.: Delhi High Court allows cancellation of GST registration from retrospective date under Section 29(2) of CGST Act, clarifying conditions.
Shri Krishna Industries vs Commissioner Delhi GST case: Delhi High Court directs Proper Officer to consider detailed replies before forming opinions.
Read about the Delhi High Court’s ruling in Amar Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax, quashing the retrospective cancellation of GST registration.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s ruling in Optimum Viking Satcom India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Principal Commissioner, quashing retrospective GST registration cancellation and emphasizing objective criteria.
Read the Delhi High Court’s judgment on the reversal of GST registration cancellation for Singh Trading Co due to alleged tax evasion. Get insights into the re-adjudication process.
Read the Delhi High Court’s directive on cancelling GST registration for Vaani Enterprises. Discover the implications and requirements outlined in the judgment.
Delhi High Court mandates GST Proper Officer to consider replies on merits before forming an opinion, impacting how GST disputes are adjudicated.
