The ITAT held that cash deposits recorded in books and from legitimate business sales during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained under Section 69A. Entire addition of ₹45.23 lakh was quashed.
The Delhi ITAT upheld deletion of ₹2.57 crore TP adjustment, confirming that mere margin variations do not trigger 80IA(10) without evidence of profit manipulation. Revenue’s appeal dismissed.
The Tribunal held that the revision was invalid because the assessment caused no loss to Revenue, as agricultural income was exempt and the Assessing Officer had made adequate inquiries. The order under section 263 was therefore set aside.
ITAT Delhi held that partial doubts in trading segment losses cannot lead to total rejection of books under Section 145. The ruling confirms that documented losses supported by evidence must be considered.
ITAT Raipur allowed the appeal, holding that addition of Rs.11.84 lakh under Section 68 was unsustainable as no direct evidence linked the assessee to alleged share manipulation.
Because the approval was issued collectively for several years, the Tribunal found it invalid and allowed the appeal. The key takeaway is the necessity of separate approval for each year.
The ITAT Hyderabad allowed claims for charitable expenditures after verifying vouchers and accounts, emphasizing that disallowances cannot be made without substantive evidence.
The tribunal dismissed the revenue’s appeal, holding that the assessee was entitled to ₹2.36 crore deduction under Section 54F. Evidence showed only one residential property purchase, and farmhouse classification did not disqualify the claim.
Commission payments to agents were held genuine for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15. Tribunal directed deletion of disallowances as payments were backed by bank records, TDS, and recipient confirmations.
Delhi ITAT upholds CIT(A) order, ruling that only profit embedded in alleged bogus purchases can be taxed, not the full purchase value.
