Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arun Rajput Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arun Rajput Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Demonetisation Cash Deposit Not Unexplained: Delhi ITAT Deletes Entire ₹45.23 Lakh Addition u/s 69A- AO’s Human-Probability Theory Rejected: Delhi ITAT Accepts Cash Sales & Books, Quashes 69A Addition Assessee, proprietor of M/s Sunny Jewellers, declared income of Rs.12,93,560. During demonetisation, Assessee deposited cash of Rs.45,23,500 (Rs.43,73,500 + Rs.1,50,000). AO held that Assessee had only Rs.4,57,741 cash-in-hand on 08.11.2016; purchases from relatives were unverifiable; & cash deposits occurred only in the demonetisation window. Applying ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031