Partial Doubt on Trading Losses Does Not Justify Rejection of Books: ITAT Delhi

R.H. Agro Overseas Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

The cross appeals in this case arise from Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15, concerning different orders of the CIT(A) dated 20.11.2017 and 29.01.2020, stemming from the Assessment Orders dated 15.03.2016 and 30.12.2016 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The primary issues relate to the estimation of profits by the AO and the alleged rejection of the assessee’s books of account under Section 145(3) of the Act.

The AO had estimated gross profits at 10% despite the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.