Jitendra Sharma Vs JCIT (Intl Taxation) (ITAT Indore) ITAT Indore held that no penalty under Section 271C to be levied for deduction of tax under Section 194IA @1% instead of Section 195 @ 20.6% on purchase of property from Non Resident. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT The above captioned appeals filed at the instances […]
The issue under consideration is whether the roaming charges paid by the assessee to the other telecom service provider are in the nature of ‘Fee for technical Services’ and hence liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194J of the Act?
Nike India Pvt Ltd vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The AO noticed that the assessee has claimed deduction for ‘Provision for sales returns’. When enquired, the assessee submitted that it creates a provision for anticipated sales returns based on a percentage of the sales made each month. It was further submitted that the provision is created […]
Bharti Airtel Services Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) In the present case the service agreement clearly says that the amount of payment is to be made by the associated enterprises to the assessee within 15 days. Such payment was not made within that period but beyond that. The learned assessing officer held that the amount […]
Vinay Bhasin Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee made heavy investments for earning of exempt income and being a busy professional, he requires the management of such a portfolio by incurring expenses, diversion of man-power/staff for indulging in investment activities to various activities like visiting banks, use of vehicle and telephone, use of internet if portfolio […]
Giesecke & Devrient [India] Pvt Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) To recapitulate, the DDT is levy on the dividend distributed by the payer company, being an additional tax is covered by the definition of ‘Tax’ as defined u/s 2(43) of the Act which is covered by the charging section 4 of the Act and charging […]
GSE Commerce Private Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The A.O. was of the view that the shares of the company have been over valued and accordingly asked the assessee to justify the valuation. After considering the explanations of the assessee, the A.O. took the view that the valuation report has been prepared on the basis […]
Since assessee had expended the amount well within period of 3 years from the date of sale of original asset, assessee was entitled to proportionate deduction under section 54F though the assessee had not deposited capital gains amount in the Capital Gains Account Scheme within the prescribed time.
Dr. NT Ghatte Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (ITAT Pune) Merely because the trust has not spent any amount of its income for charitable activities and the fact that the trust has not spent any amount of income for charitable purpose does not amount to carrying on the activities contrary to its objects. The submission of […]
Mahalaxmi Buildwell India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) We find, the AO, in the instant case, has made addition of Rs.17,15,113/- for assessment year 2009-10 and Rs.30 lacs for assessment year 2010-11 in the orders passed u/s 153A r.w. section 143(3). A perusal of the assessment order shows that the addition of Rs.16,77,983/- out […]
