Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Haider Noman Kohrakiwala Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Haider Noman Kohrakiwala Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The other reasoning of the A.O. not to grant deduction u/s 54F of the Act in respect of a sum of Rs.12,33,200/- was that assessee did not deposit capital gains amount in the capital gains account scheme before the date of furnishing of return of income u/s 139 of the Act. The Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs. K. Ramachandra Rao (2015) 277 CTR (Kar) 522 has held that when assessee invest the entire sale consideration in construction of a residential house within the period stipulated u/s 54F(1) of the Act, then section 5...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930