Kunwar Tuli Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) We find that the Assessing Officer has disallowed the part of the commission expenses paid on the ground that the assessee failed to produce the requisite evidences, including contract agreement between the parties and the assessee sought to justify the commission expenses only in view of the tax […]
Nilkantha Saha Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) AO Cannot Simultaneously Reject and Rely Audited Books And Make Additions Under Section 68 For Cash Deposit During Demonetisation Period Out Of Cash Sales From a perusal of the cash deposits/ banking transactions, the Ld. A.R drew our attention to the fact that as per the audited books, especially […]
Daawat Foods Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) As far as the disallowance of the depreciation of Rs.93,406/-on the capital expenditure is concerned, we find that AO has disallowed the depreciation on the capital expenditure of Rs.5,35,468/- which has been stated to have been incurred by the assessee in cash. We find that the Co-ordinate Bench […]
Abid Ali Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), Aligarh dated 06.11.2017. 2. At the outset, it was brought to the notice of bench by the ld. AR that the assessee has filed application under […]
Disallowance on account of interest on office loan was confirmed as assessee had taken loan from Bank for office and claimed deduction in respect of the interest expenditure incurred on this loan thus, the presumption based on mixed funds could not be applied.
Income declared in survey is to be taxed and it has to fall under one of the heads of income, i.e., business income and, therefore, is available for set-off against the business loss.
Amadeus IT challenges DCIT’s order on CRS income, PE, and attribution. Key issues include tax liability, PE determination, and expenditure disallowance.
Prakash Pandharinath Bakre Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) Benefit under section 54 is available to an individual who has transferred a long term capital asset being a ‘residential House Property’ and the assessee has either purchased one residential house in India within a period of one year before or two years after the date of transfer […]
Vishnu Prasad Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) In the case of the assessee, (i) the identity of Shri Hanuman remains undisputed, as the summons issued by the AO was duly served upon him, (ii) genuineness of the transaction is also proved (from books of accounts) beyond doubt, as amount paid as advance to him, duly appeared […]
Nike India Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) It is imperative on the part of the A.O. to show that there was failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts relating to the assessment. Admittedly, no such allegation has been made by the A.O. in the reasons for […]
