Merely because the some Directors did not appear in the case of assessee would not be a ground to have an adverse inference against the assessee, therefore, there was no justification to sustain the addition of Rs.45 lakhs under section 68 and addition of Rs.90,000/- under section 69C.
Gemological Institute of America Inc. Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: In terms of the provisions of section 92CE, refund of taxes could be claimed or allowed on account of secondary adjustments- even if, such secondary adjustments end up reducing the income of the foreign AE assesses as a result of partial repatriation of income. […]
Alankar Jewelers Vs DCIT (ITAT Indore) The CBDT vide its circular F.No. 286/2/2003-IT (Inv.) dated 10th March 2003 has issued an advisory to its field officer regarding confession of additional income during the course of search and survey operations. Relevant portion of the above said circular is reproduced hereunder: “Instances have come to the notice […]
Interworld Shipping Agency LLC Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The short issue that we are actually required to adjudicate, in this appeal, is whether or not the authorities below were justified in declining the benefits of India UAE Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement [(1995) 205 ITR Stat 49; Indo-UAE tax treaty, in short] to the assessee appellant. […]
Ashok Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Before parting, it needs be highlighted that for India to achieve the status of a USD 5 trillion economy, the banking industry necessarily needs to have a very robust and transparent mechanisms of zero tolerance of abuse of power without which the Indian ambition can only remain a pipe […]
Tapasi Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) It is observed that all the four donors who had given the gifts in question to the assessee during the year under consideration were engaged in the business and in the returns of income filed regularly for the year under consideration, the business income earned by them was duly […]
ITAT Chandigarh addresses limitations, record definition, and right to be heard in Amrik Singh Bhullar Vs ITO case. Important insights for taxpayers.
In best judgment assessment, AO had to bring on record certain material with regard to rate of profit admitted for estimation of profit with some comparable cases of similar nature or profit declared in similar industry
Arpit Goel Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) 1. Assessing Officer is not suppose to arrive at the final conclusion. He is supposed to reach at a reasonable belief, which a prudent man will arrive at, that the income has escaped assessment. It has to be a prima facie case regarding escapement of income. 2. AO is […]
Sudeep Chandra Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Cost of acquisition is the price paid by the assessee for the purchase of the house and also the expenditure towards the repairs made by him to make the house habitable and no other expenditure is to be allowed u/s 54 of the Act. As regards the details of […]
