Resale Price Method (RPM) To Be Preferred As The Most Appropriate Method, Where The Transaction With Associated Enterprise (AE) Relates To Import of A Product For Resale To An Unrelated Party.
Internal Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method (CUP) to be preferred as the Most Appropriate Method over External CUP, where direct internal comparable price is available.
Shri Sanjay Singal Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Addition of Rs. 61.86 Crore in 9 Appeals on Account of Bogus Long Term Capital Gain U/S 10(38) Claimed Deleted on Facts of Alleged Penny Scrip of PIL (Praneta Industries Ltd) and Revenue Rule 29 Application Containing Fir Filed by ED Against Companies of Bhushan Group & Statement […]
For the condonation of the delay, the assessee has to show that there must be a sufficient cause to condone the delay. In this case, the assessee himself decided as per his affidavit not to go to his house knowingly that there must be an assessment order. No one is prevented the assessee to go to his house therefore, we are of the opinion that there is no sufficient cause to condone delay. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed.
Jayaseelan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Shri Jayaseelan (the Appellant) has filed the current appeal being aggrieved against the order dated March 5, 2018 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (the CIT(A)) for the assessment year 2014-15 wherein the claim of the Appellant claiming benefit under section 54 of the Income Tax Act,1961 […]
Ramaiah Harish Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) It was held that an independent building can have a number of residential units and it will not lose the character of one residential house.
ITO Vs P.H. Chandrashekar (ITAT Bangalore) Non-disposal of objections filed by the assessee before the completion of assessment is against the procedure prescribed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (P) Ltd (supra). Hence the same will vitiate the impugned assessment order. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT BANGALORE The revenue […]
Appellant, during AY 2012-2013, paid a huge amount towards provision of toilet facilities in Government Schools where the children of employees of the Appellant were studying. While filing the returns for that year, the Appellant claimed the same amount as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenses and submitted that by incurring the expenses, its productivity improves and the loyalty of its employees are also ensured.
In so far as the certificate issued by the Tehsildar is concerned which is at page No.1A of the paper book, it does not show that from the Chidambaram how it comes to 8.5 K.M and apart from that in our view the Tehsildar is not a competent person to decide the distance.
Evolving Systems Networks India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The only other ground pressed was with regard to the action of the TPO in treating provision for bad and doubtful debts as part of non operating expense while computing operating margin of comparables. Karnataka High Court has also taken a view in the case […]
