Lakhmi Chand Tejoo Mal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) MULTIPLICITY OF ERRORS IN REASONS MAKE REASSESSMENT VOID The ld. counsel for the assessee vehemently stated that 11 entries have been shown in the information and it can be seen that there are repetition of same entries/amounts and the Assessing Officer has, in fact, at para -6 […]
Autodesk Asia Pte. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) It was the case of the assessee that the sale of software / hardware was made outside India and the proceeds received from Indian distributors / customers was received by the assessee outside India. In the draft Order of Assessment, the AO treated the money received by […]
Brace Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) A.O. disallowed the payment of up-front fee of Rs.1,10,82,175/-on the ground that the assessee was required to pay the same as a lump sum one time non-refundable fee for processing of the loan prior to the execution of the Loan Agreement, therefore, it is […]
Perfect Probuild P. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) A reading of section 194C with Explanation (iv) thereof makes it clear that any person responsible for paying any sum to any resident for carrying out the work of advertising, broadcasting and telecasting shall deduct an amount equivalent to 1% where the payment is being made to […]
Shri Puneet Sehdev Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) The activity for converting gold bricks, biscuits or bars, into jewellery amounts to ‘production or manufacture of a new article. The gold, silver or platinum in bar, biscuits or brick form, is converted by manual labour and by the use of implements/tools or by machinery, culminating into an […]
Expeditors International (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Education Cess is not of the nature described in sections 30 to 36, Education Cess is not in the nature of capital expenditure, Education Cess is not personal expense of the Assessee, it is mandatory for it to pay Education Cess and for the purpose of […]
ITO Vs Indica Industries Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Unless and until the position in initial year is disturbed, it is not possible to take a different view for the subsequent assessment years . It can be seen from the impugned order that ld. CIT(A) noted that assessment year 2014-15 is not the initial year to […]
DCIT Vs Paveljeet Singh Ruppal (ITAT Delhi) The Assessing Officer has to demonstrate from the records that there has been a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. Here in this case, the assessee has duly disclosed the factum of total secured loan, total […]
ACIT Vs Sahyog Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) Based on the above reasons recorded, notice under Section 148 of the act was issued to the assessee on 25th of June, 2013. From the above reasons recorded it is evident that all these documents were available with the ld. Assessing Officer at the time of making […]
Cushman & Wakefield Property Management Services India Pvt. Ltd.,Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) We have heard both the parties and perused the relevant material available on record. It is pertinent to note that the quantum appeal has been allowed by the Tribunal. Thus, the addition, on which penalty has been imposed by the Revenue does not […]
