Aroon Facilitation Management Services Pvt. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) I find the A.O. CPC in the instant case has computed the income of the assessee at Rs.16,58,230/- as against the returned income of Rs.6,98,610/- by making an adjustment for a sum of Rs.9,59,624/- on account of belated payment to employees’ contribution towards PF & ESI […]
The assessee classified such cost incurred and right to receive annuity on the toll road as an intangible asset eligible for depreciation u/s.32(1)(ii) of the Act.
Moonfrog Labs Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Ld.CIT(A) held that the advertisement expenses paid to Facebook and other entities constitutes use of industrial, commercial or scientific equipment under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act whether active or passive and hence ‘Royalty’ under the Act. As regards taxability as ‘“Fees for technical services’, it was […]
ITAT Delhi rules in Amandeep Singh Khurana vs ITO, disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) not valid for delayed PF/ESI deposit if made before return filing.
Payment of Rs.89 lakhs on account of pension to wholetime Directors on the basis of Board resolution of the assessee company was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business of the assessee and was allowable as deduction.
Pee Tee Turners Vs Assistant Director of CPC (ITAT Jaipur) In the instant case, admittedly and undisputedly, the employees’ contribution to ESI and PF collected by the assessee from its employees have been deposited well before the due date of filing of return of income u/s 139(1) – D/R has referred to the explanation to […]
Citi Centre Developers Vs CPC (ITAT Chandigarh) Since the facts of the present cases are identical to the facts involved in Raja Ram Vs. ITO, Yamunanagar (ITAT, Chandigarh) therefore respectfully following the earlier orders as referred to herein above of the different Benches of the ITAT, the impugned additions made by the Assessing Officer and […]
Ld. CIT(A) did not consider submission of Assessee and wrongly observed in impugned order that appellant has not given any submissions and evidences regarding the disallowance of deduction u/s.80C
Krishna Mohan Choursiya Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) We find that there is a clear distinction between a municipality and a gram panchayat as also enunciated in the judgment of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT v. P.J. Thomas as reported in [1995] 211 ITR 897 (MAD.), therefore, we are of the view […]
AO to consider only the opening and closing value of those investments which actually yielded dividend income to the assessee during the relevant year for the purposes of computing the disallowance under section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D(2)(iii).
