Procter & Gamble Health Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Undisputedly, the assessing officer had disallowed 50% of the total cost incurred by the assessee towards free samples in the relevant assessment years. Whereas, simply relying upon the decision of the learned DRP in assessment year 2013-14, learned Commissioner (Appeals) has restricted the disallowance to 20% […]
ACIT Vs Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) The ld.counsel for the assessee at the very outset submitted that as far as amounts mentioned under the head interest on NSC and interest on staff loan is concerned they are not in dispute. The deduction claimed under section 80IC with regard to both these items have […]
Ajit Lalwani Vs ACIT (TDS) (ITAT Indore) In the instant of two appeals assessee has challenged the levy of penalty u/s 271CA of the Act for the violation of provisions of section 206C of the Act. We find that the assessee has furnished copy of form 27BA along with copy of Income Tax return of […]
It not the entire sales consideration which is to be brought to tax but only the profit attributable on the total unrecorded sales consideration which alone can be subject to income tax
GRI Renewable Industries S.L. Vs ACIT (IT) (ITAT Pune) It is seen that the assessee offered its income from ‘royalties’ and ‘fees for technical services’ on gross basis, albeit at the concessional rate of tax. The assessee claimed that a sum of Rs.35.67 lakh was received as reimbursement of expenses which was not liable to […]
Vatsal Navnitlal Parikh Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) We find that additional evidences are produced for the first time before the Tribunal. These documents were not filed before the lower authorities during assessment proceedings due to family disputes. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we deem it fit to remand the matter back to the file […]
Section 10(38) exempts only a stream of capital gain from tax and not the entire source. So if the assessee incurs loss in sale of equity shares, the gain from sale of which is exempt under section 10(38), then such loss will be allowed to be set off against long-term capital gain from sale of shares as well from sale of other assets.
Vishnu Kumar Garg Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) We find the A.O. in the instant case made an addition of Rs.12 lakhs to the total income of the assessee under section 69A of the I.T. Act, 1961 on the basis of entries dated 07.07.2010 and 07.08.2010 found as per Page-14 of Annexure-A1. We find the Ld. […]
ITO Vs Sandeep S. Dagaria (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT notices that Assessing Officer has merely proceeded to make addition of Rs.7,00,000/- unsecured loans merely because the Rajat Group of Companies involved in the transaction of bogus purchases and rejected the evidences submitted before him i.e. assessee has submitted the confirmation balance and the transactions were only […]
Dr. Mumtaz Ali Khan Afzal Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad) From the facts of the case it appears that the assessee did not properly co-operate before the Ld. AO. However, considering the explanation rendered by the Ld. AR regarding the hardship faced by the assessee and since the assessee is a senior citizen, we […]
