Explore the ITAT Chennai ruling in Col. D. Pradeep Kumar vs. DCIT regarding the disallowance of Service Tax under section 43B. ITAT directs the AO to verify and limit the disallowance
The assessee has reqeusted to withdraw the appeal on the ground that with the introduction of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the appellant has decided to avail the Scheme with respect to the said appeal and therefore the appeal of the Assessee is required to be withdrawn in terms of scheme.
Explore the ITAT Chennai decision in Tristar Container Services case. Analysis of lease rental disallowance, treatment of containers as assets, and alternative depreciation claim.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling in Garg Acrylics Ltd case. Detailed analysis of alleged bogus purchases, challenges to statement validity, and successful reversal of unjustified additions.
Explore the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling in Chirai Salt (India) Pvt. Ltd case. In-depth analysis of the stock undervaluation dispute, challenges to methods, and successful deletion of additions.
The issue in the present case relates whether the assessment order has been passed by Ld. AO without making inquiries or verification with respect to the deduction/exemption claimed under section 54 of the Act as discussed above and hence the assessment is erroneous insofar prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue and thus requiring revision by Pr. CIT u/s 263 of the Act.
Read about the ITAT Ahmedabad’s ruling in ITO vs. Yagnesh Dayabhai Vyas, where disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deemed unjust when TDS was duly deducted and paid before the return filing deadline.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai decision in Abacus International Pte Ltd. vs. DDIT, where notional interest income on interest-free loans was assessed and its impact on penalty u/s. 271(1)(c).
There is no condition in section 32 that depreciation on plant and machinery is allowable only if they are used in the factory for manufacturing/production process. Assets like air conditioners, telephones, Samsung tab, office equipments and canteen equipments are in the nature of plant and machinery. Depreciation under section 32 is allowed.
Explore the U Toll Corporation Ltd vs ACIT case (ITAT Varanasi) on unsecured loans. Analysis of loan discrepancies, cash deposits, and the ITAT decision.
