Held that as the assessee was not able to furnish any evidence to the fact that the seized cash represent accounted income and also assessee has accepted that no proper cash books was maintained. Accordingly, addition u/s 69A sustained and also penalty leviable u/s 271AAA.
ACIT Vs Anush Infrastructure (P) Ltd (ITAT Chennai) Upon careful consideration of material facts, it could be gathered that the whole basis to make additions in the hands of the assessee is sale agreement dated 24.08.2009 allegedly executed between the assessee and one Mrs. Bhavika Jain. On the basis of this agreement, it has been […]
Tulip Infratech Private Limited Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) Ld. AO was of the view the assessee has paid EDC for the works carried out by HUDA and hence the same was liable for TDS u/s 194C Ld. AO also noticed that certain tax deductor sought clarification regarding applicability of TDS provisions on EDC charges […]
ITAT held that carrying on the statutory functions or activities which is mandate of the law cannot be said to be trade, commerce or business.
Sasamusa sugar works Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In respect of ground relating to claim of depreciation on molasses tanks for which the ld. CIT(a) had directed the AO to allow the depreciation after verification that the new plant & machinery were indeed put to use by the assessee. Assessee has come before the […]
Ravi Metallics Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Cuttack) A perusal of the order of the ld. Pr.CIT shows that the show cause notice issued u/s.263 of the Act has been issues only on 1st March, 2019. Admittedly, the assessee has responded to the show cause notice though on 26.03.2019. In the said reply, the assessee has […]
Mere fact that assesse had separately debited service tax in it profit and loss account and not credited the same in its profit and loss account could not be the reason or basis for stating that assessee had not credited these receipts in its books as it was to be presumed included in the sales price.
Shinhan Bank Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) (ITAT Mumbai) S.90 : Double taxation relief-Foreign Company-discrimination allowed-Company has not made prescribed arrangement-DTAA-India -Korea. [S. 2(22A), Art. 25(1)] We find that, by Finance Act 2001, an Explanation (now known as Explanation 1) was inserted below Section 90, and it was with retrospective effect i.e. […]
Shapoorji Pallonji Bumi Armada Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) We have noted that the Dispute Resolution Panel, having rejected the rectification application filed by the Transfer Pricing Officer and having held that there is no mistake apparent in the direction dated 3rd November 2020, have proceeded to rectify these DRP directions nevertheless. Undoubtedly, if […]
Rashmi Infrastructure Developers Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) In this case ld. AO however completely ignored all the submissions of the assessee and merely relied on the rejection order of the ITSC and proceeded to tax the on money receipts independently without granting any deduction for expenses incurred against those on money receipts. We find […]
