Explore the dispute in Sh. Avtar Singh case where the Assessing Officer decision to reopen the assessment is challenged. Detailed analysis of cash deposits and legal aspects.
Rupal Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) We notice that the assessee has not only discharged the primary onus by filing confirmation and the IT returns and balance sheet of the lenders, the assessee is also stated to have paid interest in most of the cases and deducted TDS thereon. Noticiably, the lenders are the family […]
Abdul Samad & Sons Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) From the finding of Ld. CIT(A), it is clear that the finding is based on the premise that the assessee failed to substantiate the expenditure however the contention of the assessee is that due to flood material evidences was washed away and FIR was duly registered, further […]
ITAT Amritsar quashes ad-hoc disallowance of Rs.1,02,350 by ITO, citing lack of specificity in voucher verification. Analysis of the case & key arguments.
In the case of Shri M.Y. Jahabar Sadique vs. ITO, ITAT Chennai confirms AO decision on unexplained cash gifts and discrepancies in business advances. Detailed analysis here.
It is a clear case of an omission and, thus, non-application mind by the AO in the matter. That an absence or lack of enquiry, which ought to have been made under the circumstances, renders the order as erroneous in-so-far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue, liable for revision u/s. 263,
The new auditor, as per the established procedure, sought a no objection from the earlier auditor, who raised certain objections. Those issues were resolved later on, which led to the delay in the audit of the accounts of the assessee.
Explore the implications of Town Essential Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT (ITAT Bangalore) case. Learn about fair market value, valuation methods, and the significance of the ITAT ruling.
Explore the Madhav Kumar Swarup vs. ACIT case where the attribution of credit card expenditure is contested. Detailed analysis and conclusions provided.
Explore the case of Bookmywish E-Commerce facing a penalty under Section 271D for accepting cash loans. Detailed analysis of legal perspectives and implications.
