Essel Mining & Industries Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT held that sale of Renewable Energy Certificate (Carbon Credit) of income received by the assessee is a capital receipt and could not be business receipt or income nor it is directly linked with the business of the assessee nor any asset is generated in the […]
DCIT Vs Vinod Chimanlal Modi (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is observed that sufficient documentary evidence was placed on record by the assessee before the learned CIT(A) to establish that M/s. S.S. Enterprises is a proprietary concern of M/s. Gunesh India Pvt. Ltd. and on the basis of the same, a finding was recorded by the leaned […]
Gurmeet Kaur Khurana Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) The relevant facts of the case are that the assessee had invested an amount of Rs.6 lacs for immovable property with M/s Bajwa Developers Ltd. The investment was made vide cash payments. The transaction was flagged. It was noticed that no tax return was filed by the assessee. […]
Urmila Madhukar Ved Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) This appeal by the assessee emanates from the order passed by the CIT(Appeals)-7, Pune on 11-09-2019 in relation to the assessment year 2010-11. 2. The only issue raised in this appeal is against the denial of exemption u/s.54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) […]
Held that impugned expenditure cannot be held to be capital and it is not in the nature of personal expenditure or for any violation of law. Disallowance of CSR expenditure unjustified.
Asst. CIT Vs Renaissance Services BV (ITAT Mumbai) Held that the receipts of the assessee from training services and computer reservation services including reimbursements shall not be chargeable to tax both under the Act as well as under the Treaty. Facts- The assessee is a company incorporated in the Netherlands and is tax resident of […]
Learning Curve Edutech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT held that PCIT cannot revise an assessment order under sections 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of issues already covered during assessment. The law is very well settled that revision jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act could be done only in […]
ITO Vs Jitendra Shanabhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) observed that there was no large number of purchase and sale of land by the assessee. In fact, the acquisition of agricultural land owned by the assessee was done by the Government and thus Section 10(37) of the Act are attracted. As regards consideration of the rural […]
Microstrategy Singapore Pte Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Insofar as the issue of treating the amount received towards provisions of software related services as FTS, we have noticed that the Assessing Officer has not brought any cogent material on record to demonstrate that while providing the software related maintenance service, the assessee has made available […]
Since, the said amount pertains to late fee and service tax, therefore the provisions of TDS does not apply to the late fee and service tax, hence we delete the addition of Rs.10,48,125/-, made by the Assessing Officer.
