Ajay Verma Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) Asessing Officer made the additions on account of 50% share of profit and partner’s salary as the Assessing Officer has held that no ITR/balance sheet/P&L account of Partnership Firm was filed to substantiate the claim. Before CIT(A) assessee filed detailed ITR of the firm and also filed the copy […]
An assessee can purchase an asset or a part thereof in the name of his wife but he would not be entitled then to the benefit of Section 54B.
Where a number of persons combine together and contribute to a common fund for the financing of some venture or object and in this respect have no dealings or relations with any outside body, then any surplus returned to those persons cannot be regarded in any sense as profit.
ACIT Vs PNB Housing Finance Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi bench consisting of Anil Chaturvedi, Accountant Member and Narender Kumar Choudhary, Judicial Member granted relief to Punjab National Bank Housing Finance Limited and Confirmed the order of Commissioner of Income Tax of computing rebate under Section 36(1)(viii). The assessee, Punjab […]
DCIT Vs Envair Electrodyne Ltd. (ITAT Pune) ITAT find no merit in the Revenue’s argument in principle that section 50C gets attracted even in case of transfer of leasehold rights which does not come within the nature and ambit of specified asset(s) of ‘land or building or both’ in the statutory provision. We thus, conclude […]
Sara Investments Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The contentions of the assessee are that the assessee firm was holding less than 10% of shares in SSPL. It had paid for 9.38% of the shares only which are held in the name of partner Mr. V.K. Dhawan and the partners are holding the shares in their personal […]
Mayank Kumar Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It was submitted by the ld Counsel for the Assessee that the addition of Rs. 16,82,836/- has been made without giving any opportunity of hearing for enhancement of the income. The ld DR could not controvert this arguments. In the light of the aforesaid irregularity and violation of […]
Sopan Developers Vs PCIT (ITAT Rajkot) Amendment for charging the tax on the notional rent with respect to the properties held as stock in trade was applicable from the assessment year 2018-19 and subsequent assessment year. As such, the amended provision is not applicable for the year under consideration. Thus the question of calculating the […]
Held that reopening of assessment on the basis of the approval given in mechanical manner without application of mind is bad in law and liable to be quashed.
Held that it can be make out that the assessee has made an afterthought to file the appeal accordingly condonation of 1070 days cannot be granted on the basis of vague reasons
