With the advent of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), there has been a transformative turnaround in the corporate insolvency resolution framework in India. However, the IBC does not accommodate and provide for specific arrangements or contains any provision for group insolvency as the legislation itself is still evolving and is designed for a single economic entity.
DCIT Vs Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd (ITAT Pune) The only issue is to be decided is as to whether the CIT(A) justified in allowing deduction u/s. 80IA(4) of the Act in respect of Container Freight Station (CFS). At the outset, we note that this issue is covered in favour of the assessee by […]
ITO Vs Tilak Proficient Nidhi Limited (ITAT Allahabad) The ld. CIT(A) simply accepted all the contentions /additional evidences filed by the assessee, without complying with Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, as it was incumbent on ld. CIT(A) to have forwarded all these additional evidences/explanations filed by assessee to the AO for its […]
ITAT held that Even if it is assumed MD was ill which incapacitated him for continuously four years , the assessee could have entrusted the task to other Directors/officers of the assessee
Shri Mohanlal Savjibhai Tilva Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) The case of the assessee was that the loan in cash was taken from his HUF on account of extreme business exigency and necessity of honouring post dated cheques issued to the third parties. Further at that time, the assessee was not having sufficient balance in the […]
Held that it is well settled law that, the sale of software product which will not giving rise to royalty income.
Held that Commissioner should not simply relegate the point that the assessment order is erroneous to the AO. The Commissioner, after analyzing the record, ought to have recorded a categorical finding and provided valid reasons as to how the assessment order is erroneous. Revision unsustainable
Focus Product Scheme (FPS) was first introduced with the objective to incentivize export of such products which have high export intensity/ employment potential, so as to offset infrastructure inefficiencies and other associated costs involved in marketing of these products.
FTS does not include consideration `which would become income of the recipient chargeable under the head Salaries’.
Held that tax effect in the departmental appeal is less than Rs. 50 Lakhs as revised vide circular dated 08/08/2019. Appeal rejected.
