SEBI Circular, Notification, provisions Take over code Listing norms Corporate laws Listed Companies FII investments Stock brokers BSE NSE Mutual Funds IPO News
SEBI : The SAT's ruling in Alpesh Vasanji Furiya v. SEBI is a significant clarification of the relationship between securities enforcem...
SEBI : SEBI flagged alleged revenue misrepresentation, undisclosed fund transfers, and accounting irregularities, raising concerns over d...
SEBI : SEBI is increasingly focusing on AI-powered investment advisory and research platforms in India. The article explains why fintech ...
SEBI : Negative net worth creates major interpretational challenges under Regulation 16 of SEBI LODR Regulations. This article explains t...
SEBI : This article explains mandatory website disclosure requirements under Regulations 46 and 62 of SEBI LODR Regulations, 2015. It hig...
SEBI : SEBI has proposed replacing name-wise executive remuneration disclosures with consolidated disclosures for AMCs. The move seeks to...
SEBI : Following representations from the Bharat InvITs Association, SEBI has proposed amendments to NDCF computation rules. The draft in...
SEBI : SEBI has proposed a framework for managing strike prices of options contracts to address issues arising from sharp intraday market...
SEBI : SEBI has proposed major reforms to the Pre-open Call Auction mechanism after concerns over artificially suppressed prices in IPO a...
SEBI : SEBI revised the methodology for computing household savings through the securities market by incorporating actual granular data a...
SEBI : The Supreme Court held that SEBI failed to establish fraud and market manipulation in RPL futures transactions. While disgorgement...
SEBI : SEBI overturned an earlier order that had exonerated the company, holding that key transactions allegedly created a misleading pic...
SEBI : The issue was whether failure to refund investor funds is time-barred. The Court held it is a continuing offence, rejecting the li...
SEBI : Calcutta High Court directs SEBI to accept Priya Ranjan Sah's payment, citing a one-day delay as not warranting prolonged litigati...
SEBI : The adjudication is conducted as per the mechanism outlined under SEBI Act and the rules framed thereunder. Notably, the provision...
SEBI : SEBIs investigation found that a substantial portion of reported consolidated revenues was unsupported by verifiable subsidiary re...
SEBI : SEBI has consolidated all AIF-related circulars issued up to May 31, 2026 into a single Master Circular. The key takeaway is a uni...
SEBI : NSE has clarified that regulatory exemptions available for Section 31 IBC resolution plans do not extend to plans approved under S...
SEBI : SEBI clarified that a cousin does not fall within the statutory definition of a relative under the Companies Act and LODR Regulati...
SEBI : SEBI modified nomination norms for demat accounts and mutual fund folios after receiving stakeholder feedback on implementation is...
The case of the appellants is that they are aggrieved by the decision of NSE to grant listing and trading approval to the equity shares issued by respondent no. 4 under the rights issue. Surprisingly, the appellants have not made any prayer for setting aside or cancellation of the permission granted by NSE for listing of the said rights issue. How can the appellants be said to be aggrieved when the appellants have participated and have been benefited from the said rights issue and no prayer is made for setting aside or cancellation of the said rights issue.
An investment adviser shall conduct yearly audit in respect of compliance with these regulations from a member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India or Institute of Company Secretaries of India.
With respect to Mutual Fund scheme eligible under RGESS, which is a tax-saving scheme notified by the Government of India on November 23, 2012, it has been decided that – a. The maximum period for which initial offering of Mutual Fund scheme eligible under RGESS shall be open for subscription, is extended from the existing stipulation of fifteen days to thirty days.
The existing Clause 24(f) of the Listing Agreement mandates that a listed company shall file any scheme/petition, proposed to be filed before any Court or Tribunal under sections 391, 394 and 101 of the Companies Act, 1956, with the stock exchange, for approval, at least a month before it is presented to the Court or Tribunal.
This circular is being issued in exercise of powers conferred under section 11(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market.
This circular is being issued in exercise of powers conferred under section 11 (1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market.
SEBI Master Circular No. ISD/AML/3/2010 dated December 31, 2010 has mandated all registered intermediaries to obtain, as part of their Client Due Diligence policy, sufficient information from their clients in order to identify and verify the identity of persons who beneficially own or control the securities account.
The Stock Exchanges are advised to report to SEBI, the action taken in this regard in the Monthly/Quarterly Development Report.
On and from the commencement of these regulations, no person shall act as an investment adviser or hold itself out as an investment adviser unless he has obtained a certificate of registration from the Board under these regulations:
Review of Offer for Sale (OFS) through stock exchange mechanism. – The Board noted that the OFS mechanism has been found to be useful by market participants and popular for offloading shares of promoters in listed companies in order to achieve minimum public shareholding.
