SEBI Circular, Notification, provisions Take over code Listing norms Corporate laws Listed Companies FII investments Stock brokers BSE NSE Mutual Funds IPO News
SEBI : The SAT's ruling in Alpesh Vasanji Furiya v. SEBI is a significant clarification of the relationship between securities enforcem...
SEBI : SEBI flagged alleged revenue misrepresentation, undisclosed fund transfers, and accounting irregularities, raising concerns over d...
SEBI : SEBI is increasingly focusing on AI-powered investment advisory and research platforms in India. The article explains why fintech ...
SEBI : Negative net worth creates major interpretational challenges under Regulation 16 of SEBI LODR Regulations. This article explains t...
SEBI : This article explains mandatory website disclosure requirements under Regulations 46 and 62 of SEBI LODR Regulations, 2015. It hig...
SEBI : Following representations from the Bharat InvITs Association, SEBI has proposed amendments to NDCF computation rules. The draft in...
SEBI : SEBI has proposed a framework for managing strike prices of options contracts to address issues arising from sharp intraday market...
SEBI : SEBI has proposed major reforms to the Pre-open Call Auction mechanism after concerns over artificially suppressed prices in IPO a...
SEBI : SEBI revised the methodology for computing household savings through the securities market by incorporating actual granular data a...
SEBI : SEBI issued a draft consultation paper proposing limited relaxation of third-party payment restrictions in mutual funds for specif...
SEBI : The Supreme Court held that SEBI failed to establish fraud and market manipulation in RPL futures transactions. While disgorgement...
SEBI : SEBI overturned an earlier order that had exonerated the company, holding that key transactions allegedly created a misleading pic...
SEBI : The issue was whether failure to refund investor funds is time-barred. The Court held it is a continuing offence, rejecting the li...
SEBI : Calcutta High Court directs SEBI to accept Priya Ranjan Sah's payment, citing a one-day delay as not warranting prolonged litigati...
SEBI : The adjudication is conducted as per the mechanism outlined under SEBI Act and the rules framed thereunder. Notably, the provision...
SEBI : SEBIs investigation found that a substantial portion of reported consolidated revenues was unsupported by verifiable subsidiary re...
SEBI : SEBI has consolidated all AIF-related circulars issued up to May 31, 2026 into a single Master Circular. The key takeaway is a uni...
SEBI : NSE has clarified that regulatory exemptions available for Section 31 IBC resolution plans do not extend to plans approved under S...
SEBI : SEBI clarified that a cousin does not fall within the statutory definition of a relative under the Companies Act and LODR Regulati...
SEBI : SEBI modified nomination norms for demat accounts and mutual fund folios after receiving stakeholder feedback on implementation is...
Any Indian recognized stock exchange or any stock exchange of a foreign jurisdiction may form a subsidiary to provide the services of stock exchange in IFSC wherein at least fifty one per cent. of paid up equity share capital is held by such stock exchange and remaining share capital may be offered to any other person (whether Indian or of foreign jurisdiction) and such person shall not at any time
To ease your burden, we have come up with a detailed analysis of the amendments to IA regulation by SEBI (Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020, so that in spite of googling for the same, you may get all your answers at once. These amendments would be applicable from October 01, 2020. Following are the key […]
Following is the composition of board of directors:- According to Section 149 of The Companies Act 2013, 1. Every company should have minimum 3 directors in PUBLIC company 2 directors in PRIVATE company 1 director in ONE PERSON company Maximum no of directors can be 15 in any company. However company by passing special resolution […]
The MoU will facilitate the sharing of data and information between CBDT and SEBI on an automatic and regular basis. The MoU will ensure that both CBDT and SEBI have seamless linkage for data exchange. In addition to regular exchange of data, CBDT and SEBI will also exchange with each other, on request and suo moto basis, any information available in their respective databases, for the purpose of carrying out scrutiny, inspection, investigation and prosecution.
Annual Compliance Audit Under SEBI (Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 SEBI has come out with final version of amendment with respect to SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 vide their press release PR No.37/2020 on 3rd July, 2020. As per the notification these amendments shall come into force on the ninetieth day from the date of […]
The current global crisis and its resulting uncertainty have shaken the strongest of economies and organisations. However, these times also create a host of opportunities, the delisting of stocks being one of them. Need for delisting Given the sharp fall in capital markets, promoters are evaluating the delisting of securities to run their businesses more […]
It has been decided to partially modify the clause 7 of the circular (dealing with investor grievance report, financial results and Accounts maintained by issuers under ILDM Regulations) and further extend the timelines for submission to July 31, 2020.
In January, SEBI floated a consultation paper on review of regulatory framework for investment advisers and sought comments from the public on the same. The consultation paper had created a buzz among RIA community as to how the new regulatory regime would turn out for them in an already challenging and competitive environment. The so […]
SEBI has made changes in existing Investment Adviser regulation via amendment dated July 03, 2020. SEBI (Investment Advisers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 Some key changes are highlighted as below: 1. Distributors shall not use the nomenclature “Independent Financial Adviser or IFA or Wealth Adviser or any other similar name” unless registered with the Board as Investment […]
There is long standing dilemma among the Investment Advisers fraternity as to which fee model should an investment Adviser adopt. It is quite obvious that advisers having different business models require different type of fee model. So ‘One Size Fits All’ approach cannot be adopted for all advisory business practice. Advisers are having inherent conflict […]
