Follow Us:

Due date’ U/s. 54F is due date for filing return U/s. 139(1) and not U/s. 139(4)

March 7, 2014 8197 Views 0 comment Print

A bare reading of section 54F clearly shows that the assessee is entitled for exemption in case he / she constructs a residential house within a period of three years after the sale of the capital asset. However, sub clause (4) of section 54F clearly says that the unutilized portion of the net sale consideration which is otherwise liable for capital gain tax shall be deposited in the capital gain account scheme within the period of due date for filing return of income u/s 139.

Deposits cannot be treated as Income of assessee engaged in running financial schemes

March 6, 2014 835 Views 0 comment Print

Recently In the case of CIT Vs. Sahara India (Firm) Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has held that amount received from deposits from the public under different finance schemes cannot be treated as Income of the Assessee as Assessee is a mere custodian of the deposit.

Service Tax – No Pament No Bail as its a continuing offence – HC

March 5, 2014 6347 Views 0 comment Print

The applicant had collected Rs.2.59 Cores of Service Tax during the period 2010-2011 to 2013-­2014 but had not deposited the said amount except Rs.15 Lakhs. The applicant had in fact never filed any service tax returns and as such knowingly utilized the Government monies for his personal use.

AAR explains Entire law on what constitutes a Permanent Establishment and Business Connection

March 1, 2014 3144 Views 0 comment Print

AAR held that various factors have to be taken into account to decide a Fixed place PE which inter alia includes a right of disposal over the premises. No strait jacket formula applicable to all cases can be laid down.

Deductor Grievance-Due to inordinate delay in filing Form 24G

February 28, 2014 6761 Views 0 comment Print

CA Sandeep Kanoi As you are aware, it is mandatory for Pay and Accounts Office (PAO)/ District Treasury Office (DTO)/ Cheque Drawing and Disbursing Office (CDDO) (herein after called as AOs) to file Form No. 24G on monthly basis with in the prescribed time as per Income-tax Department Notification no. 41/2010 dated May 31, 2010. AOs to […]

IRFC Tax Free Bonds Tranche II – Key Features & Tax Benefits

February 27, 2014 7250 Views 0 comment Print

IRFC is issuing Tranche II of Tax Free Bonds from 28 Feb 2014 to 07 Mar 2014. Key Features of the issue are as follows :- Indian Railway Finance Corporation Ltd is fully owned by the Government of India and is a dedicated financing arm of the Ministry of Railways.

ITAT has no power to grant stay beyond 365 Days

February 26, 2014 3634 Views 0 comment Print

Recently Delhi High Court has held in the case of CIT Vs. s Maruti Suzuki (India) Limited (WP (Civil) no. 5003/2013 dated : 21.02.2014 that ITAT has no power to grant stay beyond 365 days in light of third proviso to Sec. 254(2A) inserted by Finance Act, 2008. High Court further held that Courts must respect legislative mandate.

Sec. 54EC on Depreciable Assets & One Crore Exemption

February 25, 2014 14198 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee can claim exemption under section 54EC on transfer of depreciable assets held for more than thirty-six months by investing in bonds notified for the purpose of Section 54EC. Further the assessee can claim exemption upto Rs. 1,00,00,000/- by investing the gain in the bonds notified under section 54EC if he invests Rs. 50,00,000/- each in two separate financial years but within six months from the date of transfer.

CBDT not maintains details of wrong claims maintained in Tax Audit Report in Form 3CD

February 24, 2014 3324 Views 0 comment Print

Recently Advocate B. S. K. Rao has file an RTI Application with Office of the Commissioner of Income-Tax (CPC), Bangalore and Requests to provide details of Wrong Claims reported in Form No.3CD uploaded to e-filing website of Income-Tax Department for the Assessment Year 2013-14, in respect of return filed in ITR-4 & ITR-5.

In Real Estate Broking Business passing of Commission is normal Practice

February 24, 2014 1766 Views 0 comment Print

ACIT vs. Shri Damodar Dass Batra (ITAT Delhi) – The Ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 11,23,263/- made by the A.O. without considering the fact that these commission expenses are bogus and fictitious and could not be fully substantiated by the assessee.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031