Educational Material on Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 111, Joint Arrangements This Educational Material on Ind AS 111, Joint Arrangements will provide guidance to the stakeholders in how an entity that is a party to a joint arrangement to determine the type of joint arrangement by assessing its rights and obligations and to account for those […]
Notification No. 11/2019-Customs (ADD) Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 11/2013-Customs (ADD), dated the 16th May, 2013, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 318(E), dated the 16th May, 2013, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such recession.
Rajesh Jindal Vs Commissioner of Central Tax GST Delhi (West) (Delhi High Court) Counsel for the respondent says that statements have been recorded inter alia of one Sh. Deepak Taneja and Sh. Ravinder Tyagi, both of whom have stated, giving specifics, that the petitioner has threatened them since they were made dummy directors by the […]
DGAP has submitted in its report that the rate of tax on the product Trousers (Denim Jeans Design 899) had remained the same in the pre-GST and the post- GST era. Moreover, the pre-GST and post-GST base prices (excluding tax) had also remained the same. Therefore, the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have not been contravened and the allegation of profiteering by the Respondent was not established.
Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018, namely These rules may be called the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2019.
In the instant case, in terms of agreement work-wear rented out always remains within the exclusive possession of their clients and nobody else can use the those work-wear at the same time and hence effective control to lie with the user/ clients. The appellant, therefore, does not have control over the use of the work-wear. Thus the activity is not in the nature of service under the Finance Act in both during the period prior to negative list regime and thereafter.
> Longevity is a fact– we elders live longer. In 2018, in one of our retirement communities, based on eleven of CovaiCare family members who left for their heavenly abode, their average age was 83 years.
As per the discussion held during Judicial Conference held on 04.01.2019, a committee is being constituted to examine the suggestions/issues on litigation management emerging out of the Conference. The composition or the Committee is as follows:
ACIT Vs Shri Punit J. Patel (ITAT Mumbai) In application u/s.154 of the Act, the assessee has asked for rectifying the addition made of long term capital gains on sale of shares of Tripex overseas as undisclosed income. It is the assessee’s claim that the AO has made addition of Rs.3,86,192/- alleged to be bogus […]
Cheryl J. Patel Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) While discussing various issues, the Tribunal has not given any independent reasons showing consideration of the submissions made on behalf of the assessee. We are conscious of the fact that an appellate order which affirms the order of the lower authority need not be a very detailed […]
