In re Fluid Power Pvt Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) 5% GST payable on Marine Duty Hydraulic Equipment designed & custom built to be fitted on barge Question 1:- Applicability of GST @ 5% (CGST of 2.5% and SGST of 2.5%) or IGST @ 5% for the above mentioned Marine Duty hydraulic equipment, which is being […]
The Application in GST ARA form No. 01 of ICA Pidilite Private Limited, vide reference ARA No. 42 dated 20.06.2018 is disposed off as being withdrawn unconditionally.
Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Delhi High Court) The petitioner had approached this Court claiming directions that common investigations be carried out having regard to the nature of its business functioning and having regard to the fact that M/s. Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. maintains common accounts and, therefore, prepares balance sheets on […]
Kerala High Court held that the goods seized for want of Part-B of E-Way Bill can be released on furnishing bank guarantee and a simple bond without sureties.
In re Maheshwari Stone Supplying Co. (GST AAAR Telangana) Issue- Polished / Processed limestone slabs are correctly classifiable under heading 6802 of the GST Tariff? appellant has not made out a case against the decision in impugned Advance Ruling in so far as it has been ruled that ‘Polished / Processed Limestone slabs are. correctly […]
In re Bajaj Finance Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether the Bounce Charges collected by the Applicant should be treated as a supply under the GST regime? In the present case, as per details presented before us, we clearly find that there is a clear understanding or agreement between the parties in the present case to […]
Agarwal Global Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) We observe that even if we consider the selling price @ 30,675.56 by M/s Gautham Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. and the same was purchased from the assessee @ 25,000/- per MT with tax, the difference would be Rs. 4,500/- per MT. We gave opportunity to both […]
The word held used in section 2(14) implies right over a capital asset. In the instant case, right over the property was held by assessee for the period of 36 months, by paying first installment and builder issued a provisional letter of allotment and from that period, assessee had been enjoying legal right over the said property.
In re Jotun India Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Q1. Whether the supply of goods which are moved from a place located outside taxable territory and are delivered at a place outside taxable territory, would be liable to tax in India under section 7(5)(a) of IGST Act? Answer :- Answered in the negative. FULL TEXT […]
Shri Krsna Urja Project Pvt Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT Delhi held that there was no legal basis for adopting cost inflation index of Income Tax dept for determination of assessable value under Section 4 of CE Act read with the CE Valuation Rules, 2000, for valuation of captively consumed goods. The Tribunal also […]
