M/s. Kanchipuram Vaniga Vaisya-Dharma Paripalana Sangam Vs CIT (E) (ITAT Chennai) Admittedly, this application seeking registration u/s.12AA of the Act, was filed on 10.07.2014. The Sub-section 2 of Sec. 12AA stipulates that an order granting or refusing the registration under Clause-B of Sub-Sec.2 shall be passed before the expiry of the six months from the […]
In re Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) Chapter heading 2106 of the Tariff specifically covers ‘Food preparations not elsewhere specified or included’ and in view of the submissions made by the applicant it is clear that ‘Prohance-D (Chocolate)’ is a food preparation which is meant to be consumed by people by dissolving the […]
In re The Kreations Builders & Devlopers (GST AAR Maharashtra) It is mandatory as per section 97(1) read with Rule 104 of the CGST/MGST Act to pay applicable fee of Rs. 5000/- each under SGST and CGST Act to be deposited as per the provision of Section 49 of the Act. If not the application […]
In re M/s Premier Solar Systems (P) Limited (GST AAR Uttarakhand) (a) Whether the supply of solar rooftop power plant along with design, erection, commissioning & installation is a ‘composite supply’ and the applicability of GST rate’. Supply in question would covered under “Solar Power Generating System” as a whole in terms of serial no. […]
Smt. Annakkalanjiam Mathivanan Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The Assessing Officer as well as the CIT(Appeals) have to appreciate the fact that the agricultural products in this country are traded in unorganized sector. The workforce in the agricultural sector is unorganized. When the agricultural products are traded in unorganized sector in the country, expecting the assessee […]
The assessee had not filed the audit report in this case. The assessee was very casual and did not enter appearance for the show cause notice issued for imposition of penalty. The assessee has not made out a reasonable cause as mentioned u/s 273B of the I.T.Act for non-furnishing of audit report u/s 44AB of the I.T.Act. Hence, we are of the view that the penalty u/s 271B of the I.T.Act has been rightly imposed. It is ordered accordingly.
Charan Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) (i) Under Section 148 of the Act, the issue of notice to the Assessee and service of such notice upon the Assessee are jurisdictional requirements that must be mandatorily complied with. They are not mere procedural requirements. (ii) For the AO to exercise jurisdiction to reopen an assessment, notice […]
This Authority cannot give a Ruling on the question of when to raise invoices by the Applicant as per Section 97(2)of CGST Act/TNGST Act. .The value of supply for each invoice raised by the Applicant will be the transaction value and should include the amounts , if any, as specified in Section 15(2) and exclude the discounts, if any, as specified in Section 15(3) of CGST ACT 2017.
In re M/s. MRF Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Whether the MRF Ltd can avail the ITC of the full GST charged on the supply of invoice or a proportionate reversal of the same is required in case of post purchase discount given by the supplier of the goods or services AAR held that Proviso to […]
Shri Harshad M Thakkar (Gandhi) Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) We are at loss to understand as to how the factual aspects like lack of basic amenity and a non-descript temporary makeshift shelter/ superstructure of insignificant worth can convert a land into a residential house. The vast open land with naturally grown grass, a grossly asymmetric […]
