Income Tax Department requested Eastern India Regional Council of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India to request its members to immediately pay the outstanding demands which have become collectible.
Ifthe employees’ share of contribution is paid before the due date of filing the return u/s 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 then no disallowance can be made.
Shri Rajkumar Mandhani Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) In the case before us, the assessee and his wife are independent income tax assessees and the assessee already owned one house at Kilpauk, Chennai. The assessee therefore, cannot be said to have invested in order to avoid capital gains to tax in his hands, as u/s 54F(1), […]
Addition made under section 68 consequent to notice issued under section 153C was deleted because the AO had initiated assessment proceedings under section 153C for the relevant assessment years without pointing out or referring to any seized document belonging to those years and, therefore, there was no prima facierationale or logic behind issuing the said notice.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department Of Revenue) (OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS) NOTIFICATION No. 01/2019 (CUSTOMS) (NT)(VSP) Vishakhapatnam, the 19th February, 2019 Sub—Declaration of Green Channel Berth of Visakhapatnam Port Trust as Customs Area—regarding. S.O. 1021(E).—In exercise of powers conferred under sub-section (b) of Section 8 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), […]
We have already found that Form-29B is not at all significant for processing of the return as is seen from the facts of the case which indicate that such processing having been done far earlier to the filing of such statement
In re M/s. Narsingh Transport (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) 1. The Applicant is entitled to avail ITC on cars (passenger vehicles) which are further supplied to customers on lease rent, subject to condition applicable in such supply of services as per notification number 11/2017-Central Tax(Rate) Dated 28.06.17 as amended from time to time and corresponding […]
In terms of the provisions of section 245H of the Act, no immunity from penalty and prosecution can be granted by the ITSC since the complaint under section 200 Cr.P.C. for offences punishable under section 276 CC of the Act, was instituted before the receipt of the application under section 245C.
PCIT Vs Hardik Bharat Patel (Bombay High Court) CBDT Circular No. 6 of 2016 dated 29.2.2016 with regard to the issue of taxability of surplus on sale of shares and securities, – whether as capital gain or business income in case of long term holdings of shares and securities i.e in excess of 12 months. […]
In this matter learned counsel for the G.S.T. Council is unable to tell as to whether the Tribunal is constituted or not. Learned standing counsel appearing for the State is also unable to tell as to whether the State has moved in the matter or not.
