It was ruled that approval under Section 151 granted mechanically, with contradictory stands taken by the authority, vitiates the reopening. The reassessment was set aside for lack of proper application of mind.
The Tribunal held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained when income is determined on an estimated basis. In absence of clear concealment, the Rs.5.41 lakh penalty was deleted.
The Tribunal clarified that CPC could not make prima facie adjustments denying Section 80P deduction before the Finance Act, 2021 amendment. The disallowance made in 2019 was held invalid and deleted.
The Tribunal clarified that under the pre-amended law, accumulated income could be applied within five years or the immediately following year. Utilization within the sixth year barred taxation in AY 2023-24.
The ruling confirms that transactions with banks involve third parties, defeating the identity required for mutuality. While sustaining taxability, the Tribunal permitted a 5% estimated expense deduction to compute real income.
The Tribunal held that commission paid to overseas agents formed part of the true FOB export value and was not properly declared, violating Section 7 of FEMA. However, penalties were substantially reduced after considering the overall facts.
It was ruled that claims arising before insolvency commencement cannot be enforced if not part of the approved Resolution Plan. The penalty imposed by the Enforcement Directorate was quashed.
The Tribunal held that export values were reduced to account for overseas commission payments, violating Section 7 of FEMA. However, penalties were substantially reduced considering the facts and partial relief was granted.
The addition under Section 68 was deleted as capital introduced by partners is not a loan or unexplained credit of the firm. Enquiry into partners creditworthiness must be conducted separately in their cases.
The Tribunal observed that merely using the term misreporting without linking it to any specific statutory limb is insufficient. It quashed the penalty, reiterating that penal proceedings must be precise and legally justified.
