This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
200% Sec 270A Penalty Invalid for Failure to Specify Misreporting Limb: ITAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- S S R S MEM EDU Society Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
S S R S MEM EDU Society Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
ITAT Delhi Quashes Sec 270A Penalty – Failure to Specify Misreporting Limb Makes 200% Penalty Invalid
In SSRS MEM EDU Society vs ACIT (AY 2018-19), the ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted penalty levied u/s 270A. The AO had imposed penalty @200% of tax payable alleging misreporting of income; however, the Tribunal noted that neither the assessment order nor the penalty order specified the exact limb of “misreporting” under section 270A(9), which is mandatory for sustaining penalty.
The ITAT held that penalty...



