Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M. M. Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M. M. Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Estimated GP Addition – ITAT Pune Deletes Rs 5.41 Lakh Penalty The ITAT Pune allowed the assessee’s appeal & deleted penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c), holding that penalty cannot be imposed where quantum addition is made purely on estimation basis. In the quantum proceedings, the CIT(A) had directed estimation of gross profit @2.25% instead of sustaining bogus purchase addition, and penalty was later levied on such estimated income. Relying on Bombay High Court judgment in PCIT vs. Colo Colour Pvt. Ltd., the Tribuna...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930