Delhi ITAT rules in favor of a retired railway employee, deleting a Rs15.35 lakh addition under section 69A. The court found the cash deposits were explained by prior withdrawals.
The ITAT Kolkata has condoned a 265-day delay and restored a company’s quantum and penalty appeals, directing the assessee to pay a Rs.25,000 cost for non-cooperation.
ITAT Kolkata ruled that a deduction u/s 80P cannot be denied for a belated return in AY 2019-20, as the power to do so was only added from AY 2021-22.
The Patna ITAT holds that Section 69 applies even without books of account, but remands a case for fresh verification after the assessee provided new evidence of earlier cash payments.
ITAT Raipur has ruled that a CIT(A) cannot dismiss an appeal in limine due to delay, emphasizing that cases must be decided on their merits after proper inquiry.
The ITAT Mumbai has ruled on the distinction between rental income and income from providing facilities. The Tribunal classified rental as “House Property” income and facility charges as “Business Income,” remanding several other issues.
The ITAT Ahmedabad condoned a 1890-day delay and remanded a case to the AO, directing the recalculation of capital gains for a co-owner by considering the DVO’s valuation and the indexed cost of acquisition.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has ruled that the Finance Act 2022 amendment, which removed the one-year extension for trust income utilization, applies prospectively, not retrospectively.
ITAT Bangalore quashes assessments against Blueline Foods, ruling that a survey is not a valid search and that a panchanama in the company’s name is required.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has remanded a case to the AO to re-examine a taxpayer’s claim for a Section 54B deduction on capital gains from a contingent sale, noting that a critical escrow arrangement was not considered.