Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Swastik Properties & Developers Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Swastik Properties & Developers Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Appeals restored as CIT(A) cannot dismiss for Non-Prosecution – Opportunity Granted to prove Commission Payments : ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT has set aside the orders of the NFAC which had dismissed Assessee ’s appeals for non-prosecution & restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for a fresh adjudication on merits. Swastik Properties & Developers filed its return of income for AY 2018-19 declaring ₹2,63,052/-. The case was selected for scrutiny & the AO passed an order u/s 143(3) on 22.03.2021 making disallow...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031