Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs My Paper Merchants Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs My Paper Merchants Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) No Cross-Examination, No Addition- ITAT Delhi deletes Bogus Purchase Disallowance- Addition u/s 69C on Alleged Bogus Purchases of ₹1.70 Cr Deleted – Documentary Evidence Proved Genuineness, Third-Party Statement without Cross-Examination held insufficient Delhi ITAT dismissed Revenue’s appeal & upheld the order of CIT(A) deleting an addition of ₹1,70,19,475 made by the AO u/s 69C on account of alleged bogus purchases. The case arose after information from the Investigation Wing suggested that Assessee company had purchased from M/s ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031