ITAT Bangalore deletes an unexplained cash addition, ruling that cash deposits during demonetization are not taxable if they are supported by prior bank withdrawals.
ITAT Bangalore quashes a reassessment order for Star Ceramics, ruling that an improper sanction from the wrong authority invalidates the entire proceeding.
ITAT Bangalore rules that an appeal cannot be dismissed for non-prosecution. The CIT(A) is bound to adjudicate on the merits, especially in complex JDA cases.
ITAT Bangalore deletes additions in the KC Raju Hospital case, confirming that no additions can be made to unabated assessment years without specific incriminating material.
SEO Description: The ITAT Bangalore has remanded a case back to the tax office to verify whether employee PF/ESI contributions were paid on time, noting a discrepancy between the audit report and the taxpayer’s claim.
The Delhi ITAT dismissed an appeal by the DCIT, ruling that a company’s income from a property sale, already declared in its books, cannot be taxed a second time.
The ITAT has denied a deduction under Section 80ID for Ramesh Bhatia HUF, ruling that a previously used hotel building doesn’t qualify as a new business for tax purposes.
The ITAT has ruled a reassessment notice against AP Goyal Charitable Trust was invalid because it was issued after the deadline, as per Supreme Court rulings on extended timelines.
The Delhi ITAT has ruled that while unexplained demonetization cash deposits are taxable, the 60% rate under Section 115BBE is not applicable for AY 2017-18.
The Delhi ITAT has ruled that an assessment order passed beyond the three-month statutory timeline of Section 153(5) is invalid, restoring the returned income for Hitachi Astemo.
