Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hi Techno Control System Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hi Techno Control System Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) TDS Delay After 01.06.2015 Attracts Mandatory 234E Late Fee- Default for Q3 FY 2015–16 After Amendment is Valid- ITAT Mumbai Mumbai ITAT has upheld levy of late fee u/s 234E r.w.s. 200A on delayed filing of TDS statements, holding that since the default pertained to a period after 01.06.2015, the provisions were applicable & levy was valid. Late fee had been levied through intimations u/s 154 & u/s 200A/206CB dated 30.03.2017, amounting to ₹85,200 for delay in filing TDS statement for Q3 of FY 2015–16 (AY 2016–17). When t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Ahmedabad ITAT: Inability to Prove One Expense Cannot Justify Rejection of Entire Books of Account Ahmedabad ITAT Allows Full Exemption U/s 10(10B) on BSNL VRS Compensation, Rejects ‘Workman’ Restriction Ahmedabad ITAT Restricts Alleged On-Money Addition to Actual Investment Share of Co-owner Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031