Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hi Techno Control System Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Hi Techno Control System Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

TDS Delay After 01.06.2015 Attracts Mandatory 234E Late Fee- Default for Q3 FY 2015–16 After Amendment is Valid- ITAT Mumbai

Mumbai ITAT has upheld levy of late fee u/s 234E r.w.s. 200A on delayed filing of TDS statements, holding that since the default pertained to a period after 01.06.2015, the provisions were applicable & levy was valid.

Late fee had been levied through intimations u/s 154 & u/s 200A/206CB dated 30.03.2017, amounting to ₹85,200 for delay in filing TDS statement fo

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Quashes U/s 143(3) Assessment for Want of U/s 153C Jurisdiction ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271D Penalty on Cash Sale Receipt ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271FAA Penalty for SFT Delay Second OGE Non-Est; Two U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254 Orders for Same AY Invalid – Revenue Appeals Dismissed by ITAT Bangalore ITAT Chandigarh Allows Sec 80P(2)(d) Deduction – 31 Oct Due Date Applies Due to Statutory Audit View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728