Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ideal Energy Projects Limited. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ideal Energy Projects Limited. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT has deleted penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) holding that mere making of a claim which is ultimately disallowed does not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income. Assessee, engaged in generation of power through a thermal project, had filed return for AY 2012-13 declaring income of ₹6.10 lakh. During reassessment proceedings u/s 147, AO disallowed interest expenditure of ₹18.32 lakh claimed u/s 57 against interest income earned on short-term parking of borrowed funds. AO held that the expenditure wa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031