Cochin ITAT rules that only essential expenses like plumbing and electrical works qualify for deduction under Section 54F, while luxury interiors such as modular kitchens, wardrobes, and ACs are not eligible. Partial relief granted.
ITAT Nagpur has set aside the dismissal of Balkishan Mohanlal Gandhi’s appeal. The Tribunal ruled that the CIT(A)’s two notices with very short deadlines did not constitute a fair opportunity, and the order was invalid as it failed to be a speaking order.
ITAT Nagpur remands Alankar Real Estates’ case to CIT(A) for a fresh hearing. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)’s dismissal and simultaneous adjudication on merits contradictory, denying the assessee a fair chance.
The ITAT Nagpur has ruled that income surrendered during a survey from an excess stock of jewelry is business income, not an unexplained investment.
The ITAT Delhi ruled that receipts for online journal access are business income, not royalty. The court held that without a Permanent Establishment, a US company’s income is not taxable in India.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Cochin has quashed an assessment order against Al Zarafa Travel & Manpower Consultants, ruling that the Assessing Officer’s jurisdiction was invalid.
ITAT Nagpur remands Mohd. Siraj’s appeal to CIT(A), allowing him a fresh chance to prove large bank deposits belonged to his employer, not him.
ITAT Mumbai deleted a Rs.7 lakh addition made to a non-resident Indian, ruling that his explanation for property investment was plausible, with funds sourced from NRE account withdrawals and jewelry sales.
The ITAT Mumbai upheld the deletion of a Rs.49 lakh addition made to Kolar Paper Mills for a CSR donation. The court ruled that the company had already disallowed the expenditure and had not claimed any deductions, thus preventing double taxation.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Raipur Bench, has quashed the assessment against Pawan Kumar Agrawal, ruling that the mandatory prior approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act.
