Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kundoly Krishnakutty Sunil Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kundoly Krishnakutty Sunil Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin) Cochin ITAT Partly Allows 54F Claim – Only Essential Plumbing Accepted as Habitable Expense- Luxury Interiors Like Modular Kitchen Not Eligible u/s 54F, Rules Tribunal Assessee filed return declaring income of ₹50,85,060. AO completed scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) on 10.12.2018 restricting deduction u/s 54F to ₹2,03,79,316 as against ₹2,24,25,368 claimed, & restricting deduction u/s 80C to ₹70,462 as against ₹1,50,000 claimed. The claim u/s 54F included ₹26,94,260 towards post-purchase works such as interiors, modular kitchen, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930