Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohd. Siraj Haji Mohd. Yasin Abala Vs ITO (ITAT Nagpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2014–15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohd. Siraj Haji Mohd. Yasin Abala Vs ITO (ITAT Nagpur) Onus on Assessee to Prove Cash Belonged to Employer, Not Himself – Ex-Parte 69A Additions Set Aside – Tribunal Restores Appeals for Fresh Hearing Assessee filed three appeals challenging orders of CIT(A)/NFAC dated 25.03.2025 which upheld additions of unexplained money u/s 69A. AO had made additions of ₹1.10 crore in AY 2014-15 & similar additions in AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18 based on large cash deposits found in Assessee’s bank account. CIT(A), despite issuing five notices, received no compliance from the Assessee & c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930