Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Faisal Badruddin Shitware Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Faisal Badruddin Shitware Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Non-Resident Gets Relief – Mumbai ITAT Deletes ₹7 Lakh Addition – Jewellery Sale & NRE Withdrawals Accepted-– Tribunal Quashes 69 Addition on Property Investment Assessee, a non-resident employed in Dubai, did not file return of income for AY 2016-17. AO noticed investment of ₹55,03,000 in property & bank interest of ₹13,138, leading to notice u/s 148 on 16.03.2023. As no reply was filed to 148A(b) notice, reassessment was initiated. In draft order, AO proposed addition of ₹31,33,620 u/s 69 as unexplained investment. On o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930