Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandrakant Pandharinath Hande Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandrakant Pandharinath Hande Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee, a small-scale commission agent dealing in sale & purchase of lands, filed appeal against the order of NFAC-CIT(A). The appeal challenged confirmation of an addition of ₹ 9,53,539 made by AO towards commission income, which had been treated as income outside the presumptive provisions of Section 44AD. Assessee had not filed return for A.Y. 2013-14. The case was reopened u/s 148. In response, he filed return on 29-11-2019 declaring total income of ₹ 3,23,225 on presumptive basis u/s 44AD & claime refund of ₹ 1,20,760. Duri...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930