This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Service of Section 143(2) notice on wrong address is not a valid service
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shivaji S. Desai Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-10
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Shivaji S. Desai Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
The service of notice issued under Section 143(2) of the Act directly by affixture, and that too, on an address on which the assessee had never resided or carried its business is not a valid service. In fact, there is no service of notice issued under section 143(2) of the Act on the assessee. Assessment under section 143(3) made without notice under section 143(2) of the Act suffers from jurisdictional defect. Consequently, the assessment proceedings arising therefrom are vitiated.
Here we would like to observe that no argument was raised...





