Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

CESTAT Allows Discount Abatement as One-to-One Correlation Held Impractical in Jewellery Trade

Case Law Details

Case Name
Titan Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Titan Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) Excise Duty Demand Set Aside Because Department Ignored Commercial Realities of Stock Transfers; Chartered Accountant Certificates Accepted Because Department Failed to Disprove Discount Claims; CESTAT Rejects Excise Valuation Method Because Invoice-Wise Verification Was Impracticable; Discount Abatement Cannot Be Denied Solely for Lack of Transaction-Wise Correlation; Excise Abatement Allowed Because Department Failed to Suggest Alternative Valuation Method. In , the Customs, Excise and Service...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,775

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *