Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Service of procuring export order for assessee cannot be termed as FTS

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Facts- Assessee appointed M/s. ACE as its agent for procuring export orders in France. Assessee debited a sum of INR 1,16,99,172 as commission paid on export sales. However, no tax was deducted by the assessee on the said payment. Conclusion- The assessee has made agreement with M/s. ACE every year, though scope of the services remained same. The Learned DR could not bring before us any evidence as regard to change of scope of services rendered by the said agent in the year under consideration as compared to earlier year. For ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *