This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Service of procuring export order for assessee cannot be termed as FTS
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Facts- Assessee appointed M/s. ACE as its agent for procuring export orders in France. Assessee debited a sum of INR 1,16,99,172 as commission paid on export sales. However, no tax was deducted by the assessee on the said payment.
Conclusion- The assessee has made agreement with M/s. ACE every year, though scope of the services remained same. The Learned DR could not bring before us any evidence as regard to change of scope of services rendered by the said agent in the year under consideration as compared to earlier year.
For ...





